Skip To Main Content

Logo Image

School Finance 101

On this page, community members can learn the basics of school finance in Texas. Included is an overview of how districts are funded and where the money goes; definitions of key concepts and common acronyms; and frequently asked questions.

Understanding Keller ISD School Finance

Money Coming In (Revenues)

Public schools in the state of Texas are funded from three main sources: local school district property taxes, state funds, and federal funds, with the majority of funding coming from local property taxes collected by school districts and state funds.

Texas School Funding

Texas lags behind the national average in per pupil spending. 

Graphic that shows Texas is $4,000 behind the national average and in the bottom 10 for per pupil spending.

 

Basic Allotment

The Basic Allotment (BA) is set by the Texas legislature, guaranteeing every school district a certain amount of funding for each student based on their Average Daily Attendance (ADA). The BA is currently set at $6,215 per student, with additional funding based on district and student characteristics. The district’s Tier 1 Entitlement is determined by this Basic Allotment and the characteristics of students in the district.

The Tier 1 Entitlement is covered by a sharing of the state with the local district. The state covers a specific portion from the Available School Fund and then local tax collections are applied to determine whether or not the state contributes additional funds.

Example 1

If the district’s local tax collections cover the Tier 1 Entitlement, then only Available School Funds are distributed.

Example 2

If the district’s local tax collections do not fully cover the Tier 1 Entitlement, state funds are received to make up the difference in addition to the Available School Funds.

Example 3

If the district’s local tax collections cover the Tier 1 Entitlement to the extent that no additional state aid (above Available School Funds) is needed to cover the total cost, then the district is required to send the tax collections exceeding the Tier 1 Entitlement back to the state through the mechanism known as recapture.

This creates a relationship between local and state funds where when local tax collections increase, state funds to a school district decrease.

Diagram showing how State Contribution and Local Property Taxes offset each other

 

Local

Local tax dollars make up the majority of the district’s revenue sources. The school district’s board of trustees sets the local property tax rate each year while the county appraisal district determines the market value of property within the county or district.

In an area like Keller ISD where home values are rapidly increasing, even when the tax rate stays the same or is lowered, homeowners will likely see an increase in the total amount of taxes owed due to the higher property values. HB3 requires a lowering of the M&O tax rate in an effort to offset the impact of rising property values; however, the lowered M&O tax rate does not fully accomplish this objective.

A pie chart titled %22Revenues - Where We Get Our Funds%22 displays that 57% of funds come from local sources, 42% from state, and 1% from federal.

State

The amount of state revenue earned each year is determined by the Tier 1 Entitlement calculation and in Tier 2 by the guaranteed yields on the golden and copper penny portions of the tax rate.

When local property tax collections do not fully fund the Tier 1 entitlement, state revenues are earned. When local property tax collections result in more revenues than are necessary to cover the Tier 1 Entitlement, the district sends those excess tax collections to the state through a mechanism called recapture.

In Tier 2, if the golden pennies and copper pennies do not produce the required revenue per student, then additional state revenues are earned. There is no recapture on the tax collections generated by the golden penny portion of the tax rate; however, the copper penny revenue is subject to recapture.

As local tax collections increase, state funds to a school district decrease.

Federal

Federal funding for Texas school districts varies from district to district based on various federal grants and formulas. Federal funds in the General Fund are generated from indirect costs charged to the federal grants and programs related to special education services.

Most federal revenues received by a school district are accounted for in Special Revenue Fund groups and not the General Fund.


 

Maintenance & Operations versus Interest & Sinking

School budgets and tax rates are made up of two parts: Maintenance and Operation (M&O) and Interest and Sinking (I&S). The money generated from each part can only be used for specific types of expenses.

M&O versus I&S funding graphic

Maintenance & Operations (M&O)

Funding coming into this bucket is primarily used for operating the district. Employee salaries and benefits; student educational resources; classroom supplies and equipment; and contracted services – like utilities, insurance, legal and audit services, etc. – are paid from this source of funding. 

To relate this to the average community member, this is similar to things like car fuel and routine maintenance, groceries, clothing, cleaning supplies, and utilities like electricity and water.

Compression of the M&O tax rate – or the automatic reduction of the M&O portion of the tax rate introduced as part of HB3 – is meant to limit revenue growth from local property taxes to about 2.5 percent each year. Because of this, an increase in property values does not equal a proportional increase in revenues to the district.

The M&O funding source is split into two tiers: Tier 1 and Tier 2.

M&O Funds Restrictions

Can use toward:

  • Employee salaries
  • Employee benefits
  • Student educational resources
  • Classroom supplies and equipment
  • Utilities
  • Insurance
  • Legal and audit services

Cannot use toward:

  • Paying debt when raising M&O rate while lowering I&S rate.

 

Interest & Sinking (I&S)

Funds from this portion of the tax rate can only be used 1) to pay off bonds sold for construction and capital improvements to facilities and 2) to buy furniture, equipment and/or to purchase land. I&S funds cannot be used for operational costs, such as salaries and benefits, nor can these funds be used to construct facilities. They can only be used to pay down outstanding debt. A school district can only take on new debt through a voter-approved bond election.

To relate this to the average community member, this is similar to the purchase of big-ticket items like a new home, house renovations, kitchen appliances, new mechanical systems or a new car.

Revenue generated from this portion of the tax rate is not subject to recapture and is directly linked to property value growth without a cap. Because of this, an increase in property values does equal an increase in total revenues for debt repayment.

I&S funds cannot be used for operational costs, such as salaries and benefits, nor can these funds be used to construct facilities. They can only be used to pay down outstanding debt.

I&S Funds Restrictions

Can use toward:

  • Paying off bonds sold for construction, renovations
  • Early repayment of outstanding debt

Cannot use toward:

  • Construct facilities
  • Capital improvements to facilities
  • Employee salaries
  • Employee benefits
  • Student educational resources
  • Supplies and equipment
  • Utilities
  • Insurance
  • Legal and audit services

 


 

Recapture

Money Not Staying with a School District 

Recapture is the state’s mechanism for making sure that a district with really high property values does not have more funding than a neighboring district without those high values.

The state provides more funding to school districts with lower local property tax revenues; less state funding to districts with a strong source of local property tax revenues; and requires districts with the highest local property wealth per student to give some of their local tax revenue back to the state. This latter option is referred to as recapture payments, also known as Robin Hood payments.

The money sent back to the state through recapture comes from money generated from the M&O portion of the tax rate that generates more revenue than needed. 


 

Money Going Out (Expenditures)

A visual breakdown of the district’s budget is represented in the pie chart below. A large portion of each dollar is spent in the classroom on instructional costs. When looking for cost reductions, it is difficult to make a significant reduction without impacting the classroom.

In Keller ISD, payroll costs made up 87% percent of the 2025–26 budget. Payroll costs included 3,903 employees such as teachers, librarians, instructional aides, custodians, principals, administrators and more.

Budget Breakdown

  • 86% on payroll and employee benefits
  • 8% on contracted services and utilities
  • 4% on supplies and materials
  • 2% on travel and other operational costs

A large share of a school district’s operating budget – the funds accessed by the M&O portion of the tax rate – goes toward payroll.

Other expenditures include utilities, contracted services, student educational resources, classroom supplies and equipment, travel, and legal and audit services.

2024-2025 Budget Breakdown

A pie chart displays the 2024-2025 budget breakdown, with a large teal slice representing 86% of "Payroll & Benefits" dominating the foreground against a white background.

 

Payroll Breakdown

  • 54.1% on teachers
  • 21.1% on auxiliary staff
  • 9.7% on professional support
  • 10% on educational aids
  • 3.4% on campus administration
  • 1.7% on central administration

2024-2025 Payroll Breakdown

A pie chart displays the breakdown of staff categories, with %22Auxiliary%22 representing the largest portion at 54.1%, and a legend identifying the different colored segments.

 


 

Fund Balance

A fund balance is like a savings account or emergency account that includes money that school districts do not allocate in budgets and hold in reserve. Fund balance is generated when annual revenues exceed actual operating costs. These funds are used to manage fluctuations in cash flow and to cover unforeseen expenses. Districts with a healthy fund balance also typically earn a higher credit rating because they are viewed as financially sound.

Keller ISD's Fund Balance Compared to TEA Recommendation

Chart of Keller ISD Fund Balance compared to state recommendation

 


Compression of the Tax Rate

HB3 created a system of funding meant to limit the amount of additional revenue generated from the M&O tax rate on rising property values to approximately 2.5 percent year over year. As a result, as property values grow, a school district is required to reduce the M&O tax rate to meet this 2.5-percent cap. Because of this, an increase in property values does not equal a proportional increase in revenues for a school district.